Skip to main content

State v. Timmons

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 2837

Syllabus

Drugs heroin Crim.R. 11 plea voluntary maximum consecutive sentence clear and convincing R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 ineffective assistance. Appellant's convictions for drug-related offenses and the sentences imposed in three underlying cases were upheld. The record reflected that the trial court complied with Crim.R. 11 and that appellant's guilty pleas were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Trial court did not err in the imposition of maximum, consecutive sentences, and it could not be determined by clear and convincing evidence that the record did not support the trial court's findings or the sentence imposed. Appellant failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel.

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.