State v. Cramer
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 308
Syllabus
Anders Crim.R. 11 psychiatric reports. The trial court granted counsel's motion to withdraw because the record reflected that defendant pleaded guilty knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily, and the court met the Crim.R. 11 requirements prior to accepting his guilty plea. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a psychiatric report. The court agreed with appointed counsel that any error raised on appeal would be wholly frivolous. Thus, pursuant to Anders v. California, counsel's request to withdraw was granted, and the appeal was dismissed.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. EsparzaOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 106×
- State v. PoageOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-17· cited 17×
- State v. TimmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-19· cited 2×
- State v. GunnelsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.