State v. Binford

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 90

Syllabus

Sufficiency of evidence manifest weight of evidence ineffective assistance of counsel consecutive sentences. Defendant's convictions for felonious assault, having weapons while under disability, and improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence there is no requirement the state must produce the gun used by defendant, and two witnesses testified that they saw the defendant shooting out of his car window trial counsel was not ineffective for not introducing a police body camera video into evidence where counsel asked a witness about his inconsistent statements on the video and those statements were not necessarily helpful to the defendant's defense the trial court properly imposed an 11-year prison sentence where the record reflects the court considered the purposes and principles of R.C. 2929.11 and the factors of R.C. 2929.12, and made the R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) statutory findings for imposing consecutive sentences.