Skip to main content

State v. Tidwell

Citations

  • 259 Or. App. 152
  • 313 P.3d 345
  • 2013 WL 5819562
  • 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 1314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that two DUII charges should have been severed given the “probable effectiveness of limiting instructions to the jury”
  • affirming trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to sever two driving under the influence of intoxicants charges where the charges were based on “discrete incidents on separate days, and the evidence in each case was uncomplicated and supported by separate witnesses”
  • “Both [driving under the influence] charges involved discrete incidents on separate days, and the evidence in each case was uncomplicated and supported by separate witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Muniz, Nakamoto, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.