Oregon Supreme Court· 11/13/1998

State v. Miller

Citations

969 P.2d 1006
327 Or. 622
1998 Ore. LEXIS 943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing the risk that a jury may use evidence admitted to prove one count in deciding whether the state has proved a joined count
requiring a “case-by-case assessment” on the issue of substantial prejudice resulting from joinder
When charges against a defendant are “joined lawfully for trial,” the evidence of the defendant’s criminal conduct is “relevant to prove that defendant had perpetrated the partic- ular offenses to which that evidence pertain[s].”
“The inquiry into the likelihood of prejudice under ORS 132.560(3) may encompass an analysis of the admissibility in a joint trial of evidence of prior crimes, wrongs, or acts under OEC 404(3)[,] * * * [h]owever, the question of prejudice under ORS 132.560(3
whether joinder of the offenses was likely to cause prejudice
affirming denial of motion to sever

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen Durham, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.