State v. Roelle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court did not err in joining defendant’s drug crimes with crimes against persons where evidence was sufficiently simple and distinct
• “The questions before the jury regarding the drug crimes were simple and separate from the questions regarding the person crimes, even though the drug crimes were alleged to have occurred on the same day as some of the person crimes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gensler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-08· cited 21×
• State v. Delaney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-15· cited 7×
• State v. Turner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Thompson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 139×
• State v. Luers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-14· cited 35×
• State v. Luers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-13· cited 33×
• State v. Dimmick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-15· cited 21×
• State v. Tidwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-30· cited 17×
• State v. Norkeveck
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-22· cited 10×