Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 7/7/2003
State v. Thompson
Citations
- 584 S.E.2d 131
- 355 S.C. 255
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 103
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that asking the defendant if he understood the consequences of proceeding pro se was \‘quite obvi- ously impossible’ when a defendant fails to appear in court\
- stating that forfeiture requires extremely dilatory conduct and situations involving forfeiture are unusual, typically involving a manipulative or disruptive defendant
- listing examples of conduct various courts have found to rise to the level of forfeiture
- \A defendant may waive his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. A waiver is an intentional and voluntary relinquishment of a known right.\
- \A defendant may waive his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. A waiver is an intentional and voluntary relinquishment of a known right.\
- \A defendant can forfeit his right to counsel irrespective of his knowledge of ... the dangers of self-representation.\ (citing Goldberg , 67 F.3d at 1100 )
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Goolsby, Huff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 49×
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-26· cited 35×
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-05-05· cited 24×
- United States v. Zuberi Muata Hondo, A/K/A Kevin ParkerFourth Circuit· 2004-04-30· cited 21×
- State v. KIRK N.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 17×
- State v. FaireyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-16· cited 15×
- City of Aiken v. David Michael KoontzCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-03-20· cited 14×
- Osbey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-03-06· cited 11×
- State v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-30· cited 7×
- In the Interest of Christopher H.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 3×
- Ex Parte JacksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-01-08· cited 2×
- State v. PrideCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-02-20· cited 2×
- City of Columbia v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-01-08· cited 1×
- United States v. HondoFourth Circuit· 2004-04-30
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 1,061×
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansFifth Circuit· 1982-01-11· cited 425×
- Wold v. WoldSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 312×
- United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergThird Circuit· 1995-10-16· cited 259×
- United States v. Jackie McLeodEleventh Circuit· 1995-05-26· cited 126×
- Robert James Pitts v. State of North CarolinaFourth Circuit· 1968-04-01· cited 60×
- Robert Golden, Jr. v. Lanson Newsome, WardenEleventh Circuit· 1985-03-25· cited 45×
- Prince v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-05-29· cited 39×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-06· cited 34×
- Wroten v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-04-30· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-16· cited 27×
- Charlie Lee Foster v. Louie L. WainwrightEleventh Circuit· 1982-10-01· cited 20×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-07-14· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.