Prince v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Faretta requires the trial court to conduct a specific inquiry to warn the defendant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation
• finding no valid waiver because the record \[did] not demonstrate petitioner was sufficiently aware of the dangers of self-representation\
• determining Prince was not aware of the dangers and disadvantages of proceeding pro se when, among other things, Prince exhibited little understanding of criminal proceedings and testified he relied upon the solicitor’s advice at the plea proceeding
• discussing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and noting that Faretta allows a defendant to waive his right to counsel if the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the accused is advised of his right to counsel and (2
• \Faretta requires the accused be: (1) advised of his right to counsel; and (2) adequately warned of the dangers of self-representation.\
• \The burden is on the State to demonstrate the validity of a defendant's waiver of his right to counsel.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-07-07· cited 30×
• State v. Starnes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-16· cited 30×
• State v. Cash
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-07-30· cited 23×
• State v. McLauren
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-04-29· cited 19×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-06· cited 18×
• Gardner v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-09-09· cited 15×
• State v. Cash
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-04-08· cited 15×
• Whitehead v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-12-14· cited 12×
• Osbey v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-03-06· cited 11×
• Salley v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-02· cited 10×
• Bridwell v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-06· cited 9×
• Watts v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-11-26· cited 9×
• State v. Roberson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-30· cited 7×
• State v. Roberson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-04-06· cited 5×
• State v. Cabrera-Pena
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 3×
• In the Interest of Christopher H.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 3×
• Stevenson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-01· cited 3×
• Hilton v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-02-28· cited 1×
• State v. Dial
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-01-29
• Hines v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-12-01

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Wroten v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-04-30· cited 30×