Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 5/5/2009
State v. Bryant
Citations
- 680 S.E.2d 11
- 383 S.C. 410
- 2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the \probation court's colloquy adequately informed Bryant of her right to counsel\
- finding Bryant was adequately apprised of the dangers and disadvantages of appearing pro se from the evidence of her signature of the probation notice, her two prior appearances before the probation court, and having been represented by counsel for her other probation violations
- \It is the trial court's responsibility to determine whether there was a knowing and intelligent waiver [of the right to counsel] by the accused.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockemy, Huff, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-09-03· cited 98×
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-01-04· cited 77×
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-11-03· cited 58×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-07-07· cited 30×
- State v. McLaurenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-04-29· cited 19×
- Salley v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-02· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.