Idaho Supreme Court· 11/5/1992

State v. Guzman

Citations

842 P.2d 660
122 Idaho 981
1992 Ida. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that trial court correctly concluded that there was no probable cause under the “totality of the circumstances” after rejecting a Franks challenge
holding that one of the purposes of the exclusionary rule is to ensure police officers carefully review warrants
holding that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule announced in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), is inapplicable under Art. I, § 17
noting that Justice Brennan’s article “helped to spark greater interest in independent state constitutional analysis”
explaining that the exclusionary rule of article I, section 17 of the Idaho constitution “1
Regardless whether the goal of police deterrence would be served, the state’s exclusionary rule should be applied in every case where evidence is seized pursuant to a warrant which is not supported by probable cause.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bistline, Bakes, Johnson, McDevitt, Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.