State v. Cantrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a sentencing judge is presumed to have considered the information presented during the sentencing proceeding before imposing a punishment
• holding when sentencing a convicted defendant, a circuit court exercises a wide discretion regarding the sources and types of evidence it may use to assist it in determining the kind and extent of punishment to be imposed
• when sentencing a convicted defendant, a trial court exercises a wide discretion regarding the sources and types of evidence it may use to assist it in determining the kind and extent of punishment to be imposed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Aiken v. Byars
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-11-12· cited 148×
• State v. Lambert
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-05-05· cited 31×
• State v. Gulledge
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-06-23· cited 25×
• State v. Thomason
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-07-21· cited 17×
• State v. Rikard
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-02· cited 7×
• State v. Gilliam
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-02-20· cited 6×
• State v. Neal
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-12-08· cited 4×
• State v. Gulledge
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-04· cited 3×
• State v. BLACKWELL-SELIM
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-09-15· cited 2×
• State v. Quinn
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-06

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
• Bailey v. MacDougall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-11-10· cited 12×
• State v. Green
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-11-07· cited 7×