State v. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[a]bsent partiality, prejudice, oppression, or corrupt motive, this Court lacks jurisdiction to disturb a sentence that is within the limit prescribed by statute”
• stating the proper avenue through which to challenge a guilty plea which was not objected to at the time of its entry is through post-conviction relief
• any challenge to the knowing and voluntary nature of appellant’s plea could be raised only in a petition for post-conviction relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mansfield
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-10-02· cited 63×
• State v. Thomason
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-07-21· cited 17×
• State v. Rikard
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-02· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• State v. McKinney
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-09· cited 61×
• State v. Tuckness
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-12-14· cited 45×
• State v. Franklin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-07-21· cited 40×
• State v. Lambert
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-05-05· cited 31×
• State v. Sinclair
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-01-15· cited 25×
• Stockton v. Leeke
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-10-05· cited 21×
• State v. Porter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-11-30· cited 20×
• State v. Riddle
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-17· cited 19×
• State v. Shelton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-04-19· cited 9×