State v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant was in custody because an officer stated “words of arrest manifesting the purpose of apprehending a defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Trivitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 6×
• State v. Alexander
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17· cited 2×
• State v. Hale
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-05· cited 1×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-22· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-10-07· cited 123×
• State v. Stamper
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-09· cited 105×
• State v. Stamper
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-23· cited 61×
• State v. Puffenbarger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-12· cited 16×
• State v. Lane
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 14×
• State v. Metcalfe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-21· cited 14×
• State v. Swanson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-05-08· cited 13×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Stout
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-05-15· cited 4×
• State v. Gleason
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-11-30· cited 3×