Skip to main content

State v. Stamper

Citations

  • 119 P.3d 790
  • 339 Or. 230
  • 2005 Ore. LEXIS 524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “we assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
  • noting that “we assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
  • explaining that we generally assume that the legislature “did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
  • “[W]e assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage.”
  • “we are hesitant to ascribe to the Legislative Assembly as a whole the single remark of a single nonlegislator at a committee hearing”
  • “As a general rule, we assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.