Oregon Supreme Court· 8/23/2005
State v. Stamper
Citations
- 119 P.3d 790
- 339 Or. 230
- 2005 Ore. LEXIS 524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “we assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
- noting that “we assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
- explaining that we generally assume that the legislature “did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage”
- “[W]e assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage.”
- “we are hesitant to ascribe to the Legislative Assembly as a whole the single remark of a single nonlegislator at a committee hearing”
- “As a general rule, we assume that the legislature did not intend any portion of its enactments to be meaningless surplusage.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CivilCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-01-11· cited 127×
- State v. OfodrinwaOregon Supreme Court· 2013-04-25· cited 46×
- Pete's Mountain Homeowners Ass'n v. Oregon Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-11· cited 23×
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-08· cited 23×
- Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-24· cited 20×
- Certain Underwriters v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-04-28· cited 17×
- State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 15×
- Suchi v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-20· cited 14×
- State v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-21· cited 14×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-15· cited 12×
- State v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-29· cited 10×
- State v. SimonsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-15· cited 9×
- Filipetti v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-26· cited 9×
- State v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-17· cited 9×
- State v. C. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-09· cited 9×
- Sundermier v. State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-11· cited 9×
- State v. BreshearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 9×
- Larsen v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-06-14· cited 8×
- Burcham v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-04· cited 8×
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-31· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.