Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/14/2011
State v. Trivitt
Citations
- 268 P.3d 765
- 247 Or. App. 199
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1658
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, by arguing “that there was legally insufficient evidence that her conduct was a violation of [a court] order,” defendant preserved that issue for the purposes of her appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ortega, Sercombe, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 11×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-15· cited 7×
- State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-14· cited 5×
- State v. PalomoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-08· cited 2×
- State v. BaleroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-09-07· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
- Mastriano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court· 2007-05-24· cited 57×
- State v. KitzmanOregon Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 42×
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-06-26· cited 33×
- State v. RyanOregon Supreme Court· 2011-09-09· cited 8×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-08· cited 7×
- State v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court· 2009-11-24· cited 4×
- State ex rel. Emery v. AndishaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-02-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.