State v. Metcalfe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Black’s definition of “constructive restraint” to determine what constitutes escape
• in testing the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, the essential elements of the offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Fore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-01-15· cited 21×
• State v. Lonergan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-01-25· cited 14×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-08· cited 7×
• State v. Lonergan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-27· cited 7×
• State v. Moody
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-03· cited 5×
• State v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-30· cited 4×
• State v. Miles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-27· cited 3×
• State v. Alexander
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17· cited 2×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-22· cited 1×
• State v. Behee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-19