Skip to main content

State v. Tenney

Citations

  • 464 A.2d 747
  • 143 Vt. 213
  • 1983 Vt. LEXIS 489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where contradictory evidence is introduced, it is exclusive province of jury, as finders of fact, to resolve contradictions and decide who to believe
  • where contradictory evidence is introduced, it is exclusive province of fact-finder to resolve contradictions and decide whom to believe
  • where contradictory evidence is introduced, it is exclusive province of factfinder to resolve contradictions and decide whom to believe
  • “[W]e have consistently held that it is the exclusive province of the jury, . . . to resolve . . . contradictions.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Billings, Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.