Supreme Court of Vermont· 5/21/1906
State v. Hurley
Citations
- 79 Vt. 28
- 64 A. 78
- 1906 Vt. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that procurement of tools for jail breaking did not constitute an overt act of an attempt to break jail
- holding that procurement of tools for jail breaking did not constitute an overt act of an attempt to break jail
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Munson, Powers, Rowell, Tyler, Watson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MazzadraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1954-12-14· cited 48×
- State v. GoodhueSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-09-05· cited 35×
- State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-12-02· cited 30×
- Duncan v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1962-07-19· cited 20×
- State v. WoodmanseeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1964-12-01· cited 20×
- State v. DEVOIDSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-09-17· cited 13×
- State v. TenneySupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-06-07· cited 11×
- State v. SchirmerIdaho Supreme Court· 1949-11-18· cited 4×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-11-20· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hicks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1889-06-20· cited 67×
- People v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1859-07-01· cited 65×
- People v. StitesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-04-20· cited 43×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1858-11-15· cited 29×
- People v. LawtonNew York Supreme Court· 1867-06-26· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.