State v. Derouchie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it was not clearly erroneous for trial court to conclude that defendant's acknowledgment of guilt was insincere during sentence reconsideration proceeding
• finding it was not clearly erroneous for trial court to conclude that defendant’s acknowledgment of guilt was insincere during sentence reconsideration proceeding
• allowing consideration of post-sentencing circumstances because court expressly informed defendant at original sentencing that “his situation between sentencing and reconsideration would be relevant”
• allowing consideration of post-sentencing circumstances because court expressly informed defendant at original sentencing that “his situation between sentencing and reconsideration would be relevant”
• upholding denial of motion for sentence reconsideration and holding it was not clearly erroneous for trial court to consider its assessment that defendant was insincere in acknowledging responsibility for his offense
• upholding denial of motion for sentence reconsideration and holding it was not clearly erroneous for trial court to consider its assessment that defendant was insincere in acknowledging responsibility for his offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).