State v. O'CONNELL

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[t]he specific circumstances of a particular case ... may excuse a trial court’s failure to inquire into a defendant’s decision to proceed pro se.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-11-16· cited 194×
• State v. Amsden
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-07-12· cited 20×
• State v. Tribble
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-12-30· cited 20×
• State v. Merrill
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-11-30· cited 16×
• State v. Bean
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-03-31· cited 12×
• State v. Hagen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-01-27· cited 12×
• In Re Chapman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-09-07· cited 9×
• State v. Thomas Bryan
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-02-12· cited 9×
• State v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-12-20· cited 6×
• State v. Stanley
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-07-16· cited 6×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• People v. Anderson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1976-12-21· cited 187×
• United States v. Charles Rosenthal
  Second Circuit· 1972-12-11· cited 68×
• State v. Ahearn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-05-22· cited 52×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-21· cited 28×
• Fowler v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-01-29· cited 18×
• State v. Tenney
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-06-07· cited 11×
• State v. Rogers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-03-27· cited 6×
• State v. Kozel
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-01-31· cited 4×