State v. Turner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that trial court’s sentencing decision will stand “[a]bsent a showing that the trial court failed to exercise discretion at all, or exercised it for purposes which are clearly untenable, or to a degree which is unreasonable”
• momentary error concerning which evidence was relevant to defense was corrected immediately and did not prejudice defendant by disrupting cross-examination
• “Absent a showing that the trial court failed to exercise discretion at all, or exercised it for purposes which are clearly untenable, or to a degree which is unreasonable, we will uphold the court’s decision.” (citing State v. Savo, 141 Vt. 203, 208 (1982)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Venman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 23×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-08-31· cited 23×
• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-01-30· cited 9×
• State v. Byrne
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-09-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Savo
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-04-06· cited 35×
• Laferriere v. Saliba
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1955-02-01· cited 29×
• People v. Davis
  New York Supreme Court· 1967-06-26· cited 29×
• State v. Baril
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1969-02-04· cited 18×
• State v. Tenney
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-06-07· cited 11×
• State v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-02-04· cited 7×