Skip to main content

State v. Sutherland

Citations

  • 173 N.E.3d 942
  • 2021 Ohio 2433

Syllabus

State's appeal. The State appeals the trial court's evidentiary ruling excluding nine Google searches at appellee's trial. Two of the Google searches were properly excluded, and we affirm the trial court's decision as to those. The other seven Google searches were relevant, and their probative value outweighed the danger of unfair prejudice. Therefore, the trial court abused its discretion by excluding them from use at trial. The trial court's decision is reversed in part and affirmed in part.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.