State v. Moreland
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 22
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in designating the State's firearms witness as an expert in muzzle-to-target distance determinations. The jury's verdicts were supported by legally sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err in precluding appellant from introducing evidence of the victim's alleged prior violent tendencies. Appellant has not demonstrated that juror misconduct led to improper verdicts. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2003-09-03· cited 209×
- State v. HesslerOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-27· cited 189×
- State v. SutherlandOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-16· cited 17×
- State v. TyraOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-27· cited 5×
- State v. MedfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.