Skip to main content

State v. Moreland

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 22

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in designating the State's firearms witness as an expert in muzzle-to-target distance determinations. The jury's verdicts were supported by legally sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err in precluding appellant from introducing evidence of the victim's alleged prior violent tendencies. Appellant has not demonstrated that juror misconduct led to improper verdicts. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.