Skip to main content

State v. Stevens

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 302

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it gave a \consciousness of guilt\ jury instruction, as there was evidence appellant fled the scene after trying to use a fake $100 bill. The trial court also did not abuse its discretion when it allowed alleged hearsay testimony, as the statements were not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Finally, there were no constitutional violations. The witness's non-verbal statements were not testimonial in nature, and defense counsel was not ineffective. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.