State v. Stevens
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 302
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it gave a \consciousness of guilt\ jury instruction, as there was evidence appellant fled the scene after trying to use a fake $100 bill. The trial court also did not abuse its discretion when it allowed alleged hearsay testimony, as the statements were not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Finally, there were no constitutional violations. The witness's non-verbal statements were not testimonial in nature, and defense counsel was not ineffective. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-11· cited 362×
- State v. BirdOhio Supreme Court· 1998-05-06· cited 170×
- State v. HartmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 57×
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-28· cited 30×
- State v. SutherlandOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-16· cited 17×
- State v. RacOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-15· cited 12×
- State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-22· cited 9×
- State v. BondOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-14· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.