Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/13/1992

State v. Stark

Citations

832 P.2d 109
66 Wash. App. 423
1992 Wash. App. LEXIS 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

when statute requires specific criminal intent, \remaining terms are less vague or indefinite than they might otherwise be considered\
when statute requires specific criminal intent, “remaining terms are less vague or indefinite than they might otherwise be considered”
when statute requires specific criminal intent, “remaining terms are less vague or indefinite than they might otherwise be considered”
when statute requires specific criminal intent, \remaining terms are less vague or indefinite than they might otherwise be considered\
doctor had administered several counseling sessions to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Petrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.