Supreme Court of Iowa· 7/5/2001
State v. Keene
Citations
- 629 N.W.2d 360
- 2001 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 126
- 2001 WL 747614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- accepting “the well-known fact of the risk of transmission of the HIV through unprotected sexual intercourse”
- “any reasonably intelligent person is aware it is possible to transmit HIV during sexual intercourse, especially when it is unprotected”
- “We conclude our above analysis concerning the vagueness argument applies with equal force to Keene’s factual basis claim.”
- “[A]ny reasonably intelligent person is aware it is possible to transmit HIV during sexual intercourse, especially when it is unprotected.”
- “We conclude our above analysis concerning the vagueness argument applies with equal force to Keene’s factual basis claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cady
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-08-16· cited 303×
- State v. Hernandez-LopezSupreme Court of Iowa· 2002-01-24· cited 161×
- Nick Rhoades v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2014-06-13· cited 156×
- State v. MusserSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-08-04· cited 107×
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa· 2008-11-14· cited 63×
- Mathonican v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-05-12· cited 47×
- State v. DoggettSupreme Court of Iowa· 2004-09-01· cited 44×
- State v. TrippSupreme Court of Iowa· 2010-01-08· cited 40×
- Racing Ass'n of Central Iowa v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa· 2002-09-06· cited 27×
- State v. CookIdaho Court of Appeals· 2008-05-20· cited 22×
- State v. GonzalezOhio Court of Appeals· 2003-08-22· cited 18×
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-08-04· cited 17×
- Adam Musser v. Terry MapesEighth Circuit· 2013-06-24· cited 15×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2004-10-06· cited 13×
- City of Eagle Grove v. Cahalan Investments, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-12-01· cited 7×
- State v. MacKinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2005-03-29· cited 2×
- Hamilton v. Werner Co.S.D. Iowa· 2003-06-06· cited 1×
- Musser v. MapesS.D. Iowa· 2012-04-11· cited 1×
- Leroy D. Johnson, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-05-14
- State of Iowa v. Ronde RogersCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-02-11
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SchminkeySupreme Court of Iowa· 1999-07-08· cited 209×
- In Re MorrowSupreme Court of Iowa· 2000-09-07· cited 60×
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-10-23· cited 59×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-03-20· cited 49×
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-06-19· cited 48×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2000-10-11· cited 48×
- State v. MilnerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-10-22· cited 47×
- People v. DempseyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-03-19· cited 46×
- State v. GamberellaLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-12-29· cited 40×
- State v. MahanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-06-16· cited 32×
- State v. GantSupreme Court of Iowa· 1999-07-08· cited 32×
- State v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-13· cited 29×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-12-18· cited 27×
- State v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-04-17· cited 27×
- People v. JensenMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-12-10· cited 17×
- People v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-01-20· cited 15×
- State v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-05-25· cited 14×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa· 1998-07-29· cited 14×
- State v. RandallSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-10-19· cited 11×
- State v. BirchSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-06-17· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.