State v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a privilege statute covering statements “to physicians, surgeons, or osteopathic physi cians or surgeons” does cover communications to a “responding paramedic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-07· cited 12×
• State v. Vietz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-26· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carson v. Fine
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-02-10· cited 131×
• State v. Stark
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-13· cited 29×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-27· cited 9×
• State v. McCoy
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-03-31· cited 6×
• State v. Cahoon
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-11-13· cited 5×