Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/28/1976

State v. Stamm

Citations

559 P.2d 1
16 Wash. App. 603
1976 Wash. App. LEXIS 1755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that because defense counsel cross-examined the witness about a phone 18 State v. Bennett, No. 103469-5 conversation with her son, they could not then object to the prosecution eliciting additional parts of that same conversation on redirect
due process violated absent “a specific allegation in the information of the particular enhanced penalty statute to be relied upon at sentencing”
“The defense commenced the inquiry into the nature of the telephone conversation between Fisher and his mother during cross-examination, and now is precluded from challenging the prosecution’s attempt to bring out more of the same conversation on redirect.”
prosecutorial misconduct error not asserted at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Stamm

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.