Skip to main content

State v. Harman

Citations

  • 270 S.E.2d 146
  • 165 W. Va. 494
  • 1980 W. Va. LEXIS 562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that exclusion of “testimony [that] provides a direct link to someone other than the defen dant [committing the crime] ... constitutes reversible error”
  • “a subpoena duces tecum [is] available against third parties in both civil and criminal eases ... ”
  • “There must be: ... [t]he fact that the proof is not otherwise practically available”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.