State v. Golladay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court abused its discretion by allowing cross examination of rape defendant as to prior visit to house where prostitute lived
• trial court abused its discretion by allowing cross examination of rape defendant as to prior visit to house where prostitute lived
• “It is not our purpose in discussing these facts to act as a ‘superjury[.]’ ”
• \It is not our purpose in discussing these facts to act as a `superjury[.]'\
• overruled on other grounds by State v. Arndt, 87 Wn.2d 374, 378, 553 P.2d 1328 (1976)
• erroneous instructions given on behalf of the party in whose favor the verdict was returned are presumed prejudicial unless it affirmatively appears that the error was harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).