United States v. Mikkel H. Stavig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government did not provide the defendant with an overly generous financial arrangement, reasoning that the defendant had received cocaine from the confidential informant before under similar terms
• “This transaction fails to show that the government provided Stavig with a financial arrangement so attractive that he was able to purchase a significantly larger quantity than he would have otherwise purchased.”
• discussing how under Application Note 17 of U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(17

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).