State v. Solomon

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 940

Syllabus

Rape R.C. 2907.02 sexual conduct R.C. 2907.01 gross sexual imposition R.C. 2907.05 sexual contact erogenous zone sufficiency Crim.R. 29 manifest weight motion for a mistrial abuse of discretion fair trial emotional outburst curative instruction consecutive sentences R.C. 2953.08 R.C. 2929.14 contrary to law R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12. Appellant's rape and gross sexual imposition convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defense counsel's motion for a mistrial following the emotional outburst of a state's witness. The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences, and appellant's sentence is not contrary to law.