Ohio Supreme Court· 9/28/1988

State v. Henderson

Citations

39 Ohio St. 3d 24
528 N.E.2d 1237
1988 Ohio LEXIS 305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“The grounds which underlie each of these instances have already been separately addressed and found to be without merit. Accordingly, we need not address the counsel-performance component of these grounds”
“The grounds which underlie each of these instances have already been 20 separately addressed and found to be without merit. Accordingly, we need not address the counsel-performance component of these grounds.”
“The grounds which underlie each of these instances have already been separately addressed and found to be without merit. Accordingly, we need not address the counsel-performance component of these grounds.”
“The grounds which underlie each of these instances have already been separately addressed and found to be without merit. Accordingly, we need not address the counsel-performance component of these grounds.”
“The grounds which underlie each of these instances have already been 20 separately addressed and found to be without merit. Accordingly, we need not address the counsel-performance component of these grounds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.