Skip to main content

State v. Baird

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 303

Syllabus

Abuse of discretion Evid.R. 404(B) motion for mistrial hearsay confrontational clause. The trial court did not err or abuse its discretion by permitting the appellee to introduce evidence of prior bad acts in violation of Evid.R. 404(B) because the testimony did not affect the appellant's substantial rights. The trial court did not err in denying the appellant's motion for a mistrial because the trial court provided a curative instruction to the jury. The trial court did not err by permitting jurors to hear hearsay evidence because the testimony was not in violation of the appellant's constitutional right to confrontation.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.