Skip to main content

State v. Snapp

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5276

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in instructing the jury on the elements of the offense for sexual imposition. As we have consistently held, corroboration is not an element of the offense, but a mere ancillary evidentiary requirement. Moreover, the trial court did not omit any element of the offense. In addition, appellant's conviction for sexual imposition was supported by the evidence where the victim, a minor, testified that he performed oral sex on the appellant.

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.