Skip to main content

State v. Ross

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1606

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence is not contrary to law, even though the trial court failed to notify Appellant of his Reagan Tokes rights at the sentencing hearing because Appellant waived his rights when he stated that he was \satisfied\ with a written Notifications Document. Considering the totality of the circumstances, Appellant's waiver is valid because his waiver was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent.

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.