State v. Snapp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the funds were the property of the bank “until the instant the defendant obtained ownership through her use of the forged withdrawal slip”
• vacating a defendant’s conviction when the evidence proved theft by false pretenses from a victim other than the one named in the indictment
• vacating the defendant’s conviction and dismissing the indictment because a fatal variance existed between the indictment and the evidence
• indictment charged theft of money by false pretenses from one victim, while the evidence proved theft by false pretenses from another victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).