Skip to main content

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 194 Conn. 312
  • 481 A.2d 31
  • 1984 Conn. LEXIS 733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that rules of practice supplement requirements of marriage dissolution statutes and stating that “[t]he [Practice Book] rule does not alter the statute but rather implements it... . [W]e see no conflict between the rule and the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Healey, Parskey, Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.