Skip to main content
· 1/31/2003

Manriquez v. Gourley

Citations

  • 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 209
  • 105 Cal. App. 4th 1227
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1012
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1333
  • 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating \uninterrupted eye contact is not necessary (and may not always be sufficient by itself) to determine whether the proscribed events have occurred\
  • stating “uninterrupted eye contact is not necessary (and may not always be sufficient by itself) to determine whether the proscribed events have occurred”
  • relying on the Oxford English Dictionary, court holds that \observation\ in context of breath test requirement means the act of paying attention, marking, or noticing; and does not necessarily require uninterrupted eye contact.
  • stating uninterrupted eye contact is not necessary, \so long as the officer remains present with the subject and able by the use of all his or her senses to make that determination\
  • stating uninterrupted eye contact is not necessary, “so long as the officer remains present with the subject and able by the use of all his or her senses to make that determination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Rourke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.