Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 30 P.3d 1245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • changing the meaning of the term “criminal history” in the SRA was a substantive change
  • changing the meaning of the term “criminal history” in the SRA was a substantive change
  • \the view of a later Congress cannot control the interpretation of an earlier enacted statute\
  • “[b]ecause the SRA contains no explicit legislative intent for retroactivity, and the 1997 amendment [to juvenile “wash-out” provisions] is neither curative nor remedial, we hold the 1997 amendment cannot be applied retroactively.”
  • previously washed out juvenile adjudications are not considered in calculating offender score
  • previously washed out juvenile adjudications are not considered in calculating offender score

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.