Washington Supreme Court· 11/18/2004

In RE LaHAPELLE

Citations

100 P.3d 805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[u]nder the current [Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, ch. 9.94A RCW], no offender has a vested right in the definition of criminal history in effect when a previous crime was committed”
“A sentence, which was improperly calculated using previously washed out juvenile offenses, is invalid on its face.”
\The difference of a single point may add or subtract three years to an offender's sentence.\
discussing prior times when juvenile offenses did wash out
discussing prior times when juvenile offenses did wash out
“Before the 1997 amendment to the SRA [Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, ch. 9.94A RCW], offenses committed before age 15 were often described as washed out because they were not included in defendants’ criminal histories nor used to calculate their offender scores.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.