Anderson v. City of Seattle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A released party “cannot under any reasonable interpretation of RCW 4.22.070(l)(b) be a defendant against whom judgment is entered.”
• a released party “cannot under any reasonable interpretation of RCW 4.22.070(1)(b) be a defendant against whom judgment is entered.”
• party must be named defendant to be defendant against whom judgment is entered under RCW 4.22.070(1)(b)
• party must be named defendant to be defendant against whom judgment is entered under RCW 4.22.070(l)(b)
• \This court need not decide constitutional issues if non-constitutional grounds dispose of the case.\
• “Inherent in the language of subsection (1)(b) is the prerequisite that two or more defendants have a final judgment entered against them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).