State v. Varga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 2002 SRA amendments \require that sentencing courts include defendants' previously `washed out' prior convictions when calculating defendants' offender scores at sentencing for crimes committed on or after the amendments' effective date.\
• holding that the 2002 SRA amendments “require that sentencing courts include defendants’ previously ‘washed out’ prior convictions when calculating defendants’ offender scores at sentencing for crimes committed on or after the amendments’ effective date.”
• discussing former RCW 9.94A.030 (2002); Laws of 2002, ch. 107 § 2(13)
• discussing former RCW 9.94A.030 (2002); Laws of 2002, ch. 107 § 2(13)
• contrasting Varga’s vested rights argument with the court’s analysis in T.K.
• .“It is well-established that the legislature may effectively overrule our decisions interpreting statutory terms by prospectively amending a statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).