Alaska Supreme Court· 1/11/2002
State v. Smith
Citations
- 38 P.3d 1149
- 2002 Alas. LEXIS 7
- 2002 WL 28003
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the “reasonable person” test is the second step in determining custody for Miranda purposes
- explaining that the “reasonable person” test is the second step in determining custody for Miranda purposes
- whether suspect in custody for Miranda purposes presents mixed question of law and fact qualifying for independent review
- similar, whether suspect was in custody for Miranda purposes was mixed question of law and fact
- “[W]e . . . adopt Thompson’s rationale and apply de novo review to the ultimate Miranda custody determination on direct appeal.”
- “[W]e . . . adopt Thompson ’s rationale and apply de novo review to the ultimate Miranda custody determination on direct appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Carpeneti, Bryner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-05-20· cited 365×
- State v. Weisler, State v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-09-16· cited 18×
- Munson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2005-11-18· cited 17×
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2004-10-22· cited 9×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2008-06-06· cited 5×
- Slwooko v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-07-21· cited 5×
- Loren J. Larson Jr. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-04-07
- Ralph Hernandez v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2024-02-09
- Albert Peter Macasaet III v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2025-02-14
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court· 1969-03-25· cited 661×
- Hunter v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-02-16· cited 112×
- Hintz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-05-01· cited 48×
- State v. PrestonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-02-21· cited 34×
- Gallmeyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-02-18· cited 31×
- State v. TravisOregon Supreme Court· 1968-05-31· cited 28×
- Hampel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-27· cited 25×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1989-01-20· cited 24×
- Carr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-11-05· cited 20×
- Tagala v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-05-31· cited 18×
- Blank v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-05-19· cited 17×
- Motta v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-02-09· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.