Skip to main content
· 9/5/2002

Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Perry Community School District

Citations

  • 650 N.W.2d 594
  • 2002 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 168
  • 2002 WL 2022598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding disqualification was appropriate, but referencing several ABA formal opinions where screening prevented the disqualification of an entire firm
  • holding disqualification was appropriate, but referencing several ABA formal opinions where screening prevented the disqualification of an entire firm
  • discussing the use of Chinese Walls “to prevent disqualification of the entire law firm in various circumstances”
  • relying on EC 9-2, the court held, “Because of the strong appearance of impropriety, once we conclude a substantial relationship exists between the two representations, disqualification cannot be avoided.”
  • finding an attorney was involved in prior representation where the attorney had met the clients, appeared with them in court, and signed pleadings as their attorney
  • approving use of Chinese Walls to overcome imputed disqualification in certain circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.