Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 282 N.W.2d 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering whether a defendant requested an alternative, such as “ask[ing] for a continuance” in prejudice analysis
  • “[T]he sole ‘issue’ submitted to a jury is defendant’s identity as a person twice previously convicted of a felony.”
  • “Trial court’s decision will not be overturned unless there has been an abuse of discretion.”
  • “[O]nly personal bias or prejudice, as distinguished from judicial predilection, constitutes a disqualifying factor.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
  • habitual offender statute does not create crime, but merely provides for enhanced sentence
  • this court has “long history” of not reversing on ground of procedural error unless error “prejudiced the complaining party or deprived him or her of full opportunity to make defense to the charge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, Uhlenhopp, Harris, McCormick, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.