Supreme Court of Iowa· 9/2/2005

State v. Millsap

Citations

704 N.W.2d 426
2005 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 117
2005 WL 2105806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding statute gave fair warning when meaning was ascertainable by reference to related statutory definition
concluding statute gave fair warning when meaning was ascertainable by reference to related statutory definition
holding a court abuses its discretion when it bases its decision on untenable grounds or it acts unreasonably. A ground or reason is untenable when it is based on an erroneous application of law or when it is not supported by substantial evidence.
holding a court abuses its discretion when it bases its decision on untenable grounds or it acts unreasonably. A ground or reason is untenable when it is based on an erroneous application of law or when it is not supported by substantial evidence.
addressing court’s reference to two child victims and stating the “existence of two victims is clearly a circumstance of the crime.”
providing the standard of review for a judge’s recusal decision is for an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Millsap

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.