State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• offenses committed on different dates did not arise from the same criminal episode for purposes of double jeopardy protection
• “[A]lthough defendant may have had a long term goal of selling controlled substances to customers and may have been doing so for some time, we conclude that he evinced discrete criminal objectives in making each delivery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lyons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-07-07· cited 24×
• State v. Akau
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-05-30· cited 18×
• State v. Mallory
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-20· cited 7×
• State v. Hunt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-04-21· cited 1×
• State v. Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Brown v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
• State v. Boyd
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-01· cited 124×
• State v. Fitzgerald
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-12-13· cited 84×
• State v. Kessler
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-24· cited 38×
• State v. Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-03-22· cited 17×
• State v. Hathaway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 15×
• State v. Mancuso
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-06-21· cited 10×
• State v. Washington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-21· cited 6×
• State v. Black
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-02-10· cited 5×