Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/7/1999
State v. Lyons
Citations
- 985 P.2d 204
- 161 Or. App. 355
- 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1230
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that charges underlying a violation of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO
- determining that charges underlying a violation of the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO) and the ORICO violation, itself, were not cross-related because proof of the underlying charges did not “in any way depend on proof of the ORICO violation”
- whether ORICO offense and its predicates are part of the “same criminal episode” requires court to construe statutes defining those offenses
- former jeopardy statute can bar ORICO prosecution for conduct that is identical to conduct charged and resolved by earlier prosecutions
- former jeopardy statute can bar ORICO prosecution for conduct that is identical to conduct charged and resolved by earlier prosecutions
- “It is a defendant’s burden to prove each element of former jeopardy[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deits, De Muniz Haselton, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-27· cited 21×
- State v. ForeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-01-15· cited 21×
- State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-06· cited 18×
- Jimmie Lee Custer v. Jean Hill, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional InstitutionNinth Circuit· 2004-08-06· cited 13×
- State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-23· cited 13×
- State v. NorkeveckCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-22· cited 10×
- State v. TosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-27· cited 9×
- State v. Ortega-GonsalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-30· cited 8×
- Custer v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22· cited 4×
- State v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-15· cited 3×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-26· cited 3×
- State v. G. E. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-15· cited 2×
- State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-07-05· cited 1×
- State v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22
- State v. ChilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22
- State v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-17
- State v. Hamel-SpencerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-01· cited 124×
- Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court· 1995-05-12· cited 76×
- Computer Concepts, Inc. v. BrandtOregon Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 38×
- State v. KnowlesOregon Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 37×
- State v. FairOregon Supreme Court· 1998-03-05· cited 24×
- State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-03-22· cited 17×
- State v. BlossomCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-10-21· cited 16×
- State v. QuinteroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 15×
- State v. FairCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-04· cited 14×
- State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-07-08· cited 12×
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-04· cited 12×
- State v. DelkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-15· cited 11×
- State v. Wallock/HaraCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-04· cited 8×
- State v. UmphreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-02-14· cited 8×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-03-22· cited 6×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-17· cited 5×
- State v. KambraCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 5×
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-07-17· cited 2×
- State v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-04· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.