State v. Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• thefts inspired by the same motive — i.e., obtaining money — did not constitute a single objective for former jeopardy analysis
• “A string of thefts repeated at particular times over a long duration cannot be converted into a single crime solely because the perpetrators’ methods and objectives were similar.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-03-22· cited 6×
• Custer v. Baldwin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22· cited 4×
• State v. Hunt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-04-21· cited 1×
• State v. Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Brown v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
• State v. Boyd
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-01· cited 124×
• State v. Fitzgerald
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-12-13· cited 84×
• State v. Kessler
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-24· cited 38×
• State v. Hathaway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 15×
• State v. Mancuso
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-06-21· cited 10×
• State v. Ellison
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-09-16· cited 8×